“A Divine Disturbance”
Matthew 1:18-25
December 19, 2004
St. Paul United Methodist Church
Rev. John A. Fleming
Have
you heard the story of the third grader and the Christmas play that his church was
going to have? The play was a big
production that happened every year in the church’s family life center. The play was complete with a stage, scene
changes, costumes, live animals, rows and rows of chairs, and refreshments
following the one performance. There was
not anything particularly fancy about the play’s script. For years now the ones who organized the play
used the combined biblical stories of Matthew and Luke as their script. Oh, they might add a detail or two so that
everyone could be included. And they
might put a word or two in the narrator’s mouth to help things along. But, for the most part, the biblical story
was the one that they used.
The
play’s directors started early. After
all, this was a big production. An
informal meeting happened on the Sunday after Thanksgiving. A couple of days later, auditions were
held. The third grader that I mentioned
earlier wanted nothing more than to play the part of Joseph in the
production. He remembered the previous
years’ production. He admired Joseph and
the role that he played in the drama. He
wanted the part, so he practiced the assigned lines non-stop once the script
was available. On the day of the auditions,
he arrived early. He sweet talked the
play’s director. He wore a costume to
the audition. He wanted to look the
part. He wanted the play’s director to
see his authenticity. The truth is that
there was little that he would not do to secure the part. I would like to tell you that he got that
part and gave what we might call a spectacular performance. He did not get the part. In fact, to add insult to injury, his arch
enemy, his greatest rival in the church was awarded the role. Losing that role to that boy was bad enough
and punishment enough. What was worse
was that he did not land the part of another significant character in the
drama. He was not the narrator. He was not one of the three wise men. He did secure a role; in the production, he
played the part of the Inn keeper. He
had only one line. He was bitter about
the casting.
During
the rehearsals he plotted and thought about what he might do to get even with
the ones who wronged him. He kept his
plan close to his chest. He did not dare
tell anyone what he was going to do. But
he was going to do something to make things right. And, he was going to do it on center
stage. On the night of the performance,
he took his place at the Inn. He watched
as Mary and Joseph rode across the stage on a donkey towards him. He listened as Joseph knocked on the door of
the Inn. He opened the door gently, as
he was supposed to do, and gruffly asked them what they wanted. His one line was said perfectly. His rival, his arch enemy, dressed in the
costume that he should have been wearing said, “We need a room for the night.” It was his chance to steal the show. He seized the opportunity. He threw the Inn’s door open wide and said
with as much excitement as he could, “Great!
Come on in! I will give you the
best room in the house!” Poor Joseph did
not know what to do. He was shocked and
silence seized him. After what seemed
like forever, Joseph took a glance in the makeshift Inn and said, “No wife of
mine is going to stay in a dump like this.
Come on, Mary, let’s find us a barn!”
Ah,
a little competition in the Christmas story.
I do not think that the two gospel writers who recorded the story of
Christmas would have seen their stories as competitors. I doubt if Luke was trying to out do Matthew
or if Matthew were trying to get the upper hand on Luke. As we arrive at Bethlehem this morning, the
site of where it all happened, we visit Matthew’s version to see his
interpretation.
To
be honest with you, I like Luke’s version better. His version is a couple of chapters
long. It is more detailed and complete that Matthew’s version. Luke’s story has shepherds and angel
choruses. It has a No Vacancy sign at
the Inn and baby Jesus wrapped in bands of cloth and lying in the manger. It is beautiful. It is the thing of which Christmas pageants
are made. Matthew’s version is much
shorter. It is only eight verses long
(twenty if you include the story of the journey of the wise men). Compare it with Luke and it is dinky. Matthew’s version has no dialogue, no chorus
of angels, no shepherds. His version is
like a small article that you might read on the back page of the Arkansas
section of our newspaper. It is not
front page, headline news, like Luke’s version.
Luke’s
story is different. Its main character
is Mary. She is so engaging. Her story is a story about a young peasant
girl, kind of like Cinderella. She is of
low estate, but she is chosen. She says,
“Let it be with me according to your will.”
You can almost hear the Beatles singing in the background, “Let It
Be.” Such innocence. In Luke, Joseph does not have a role. In Luke version, Joseph is a prop. He is like one of the animals standing near
the manger scene. If you are like me and
like Luke’s version better, have no fear, come back on Christmas eve and we will look at it.
The
lectionary asks us this morning to look at Matthew’s version. In Matthew the roles are reversed. In Matthew, Joseph is the main
character. Mary is nowhere to be
found. She is off stage, pondering
perhaps. It is to Joseph that the angel
makes his announcement. It comes to him
in a dream, to resolve the dilemma that he is wrestling with. His dilemma, you will remember, is that his
betrothed, Mary, is pregnant. She came
to him saying three special words. The
words were not, “I love you,” but “I am pregnant.” Being betrothed is like our idea of
engagement (though Mary and Joseph’s engagement was probably arranged). In biblical days, it worked this way, when a
girl was twelve or thirteen, she became engaged. That meant that she was bound
to her future husband with formal words of
consent. A year later, she would move
out of her father’s house and into her betrothed’s house. Everyone knew about Mary and Joseph’s
engagement. They also knew that Mary had
yet to move into Joseph’s house. Our
lesson puts the situation discreetly, “Mary had been engaged to Joseph, but
before they lived together, she was found to be with child from the Holy
Spirit.” That is the dilemma. The wedding announcement had appeared in the
newspaper. Invitations had been
sent. The preacher had done pre marital
counseling. The hall had been
booked. The napkins with Ms and Js
printed on them had been delivered and now this. It is not hard to imagine the scene. If you look closely enough at Joseph, you can
see his face fall and his soul flood with questions. “Who is He?
How did this happen?” Then he
listened to what Mary had to say for herself.
Then Joseph asked, “The Holy Spirit?”
We
do not know what Joseph said to that.
But we do know what he was preparing to do. He was getting ready to call the whole thing
off. I do not think that he wanted to do
that. I think that he loved Mary and was
looking forward to their lives together.
Joseph, though, had to do the right thing. Matthew tells us that Joseph was a righteous
man. Open the lid on that box and all
kinds of images come flying out. In the word “righteous” we see Joseph as a
little baby, being dedicated by his parents.
In the word “righteous” we see Joseph, a little older now, sitting by
his father as the words of the Hebrew scriptures are
read. In the word “righteous” we see
Joseph as a youth beginning to read and study the scriptures and the laws for himself. And now here
is Joseph as an adult. There is no
surprise here. Joseph has become a
righteous man. As Jeanie Burton put it
in a sermon that she preached on this text when I was her associate pastor,
“Prick his (Joseph’s) finger and the blood that comes out it thick with
heritage, tradition, law, and reputation.”
The story is so quiet. It does not
want to shame Mary.
You
have to admire Joseph. He is a descent
man. He is a good man. You know that he was crushed, and humiliated. Most likely he was devastated by Mary’s
announcement, as anyone who has just learned that the one they are engaged to
would be. Joseph knows what a righteous
man must do, but he will not do this in a self righteous kind of way. He also will not do it in an indifferent kind
of way. I personally think that Joseph
struggles with his decision. I believe
that he wonders if he is doing the right thing.
I think that he has trouble sleeping.
When sleep does come, he dreams.
And in his dream, an angel appears and says to him, “Do not be afraid to
take Mary as your wife. The child inside
of her is indeed of the Holy Spirit. She
will bear a son, and you are to name him Jesus, for he will save his people
from their sins.” That is it. That is all that there is. That is Matthew’s nativity. The birth of Jesus in this gospel is
contained in a minor clause. It is easy
to miss it. For Matthew, the story
really is about Joseph and his decision, his struggle, and his problem.
His
problem, when it comes down to it, is to believe that God would do such a
thing, act in such a way that would baffle an expectation. Joseph believed the promise. There is no doubt about that. He knew that the day was coming that God
would come and save his people.
Believing that promise was not what was difficult. What was hard for him to get his mind around
was that God was doing that now, through him, in this unexpected way. Every year I like to say quote the great
theologian, Frederick Buechner, and what he had to
say about the incarnation. These are his
words, “Once Jesus has come in the form of a baby in Bethlehem, there is no telling where he will show up next.” I think Frederick Buechner
is right. God has the tendency to show
up in unexpected and sometimes unremarkable places. Joseph’s problem was that he could not
believe that it was happening now, in this incredible way.
The
nativity scene is so beautiful, isn’t it?
It is the most tremendous tale ever told. Combine the stories of Matthew and Luke and
you have this great scene complete with shepherds and angels, wise men and an
unlikely mother and father. And, of
course, the baby Jesus is there. It is
the most tremendous tale ever told. We
are like Joseph. It is the same with
us. We know the promise. We rehearse the promise every year. We come to church. We hear the story. But do you ever find yourself asking, “Is it
true? Can I really believe this?” We know that it happened, but is it true,
does it make a claim on our lives and if it does, what is the claim?
This
year I would like for you to go home thinking about the claim. Could it be that Joseph is a model for us and
our discipleship.
Joseph learned that being righteous, doing the right thing, was more
than looking something up in a rule book.
He learned that God is a God of mercy and compassion. He learned that God sometimes does new
things, crazy things, unexpected things, and that we have to be open to
them. He learned
that sometimes we struggle and wrestle with problems and decisions. He learned that listening for God’s voice and
doing God’s will is what we are to be about.
Joseph is a model for all of us who have one foot in God’s will for our
lives and the other in what we want. To
be a faithful disciples means prayerfully seeking what
God wants for our lives, being somewhat sure of it, and then doing it without
fear. Ah, for a dream from God, complete
with an angelic visitation. Ah, for a
dream of telling me where to go, what to do, how to minister, and then not
being afraid to do it. That is the dream
that I want to have. That would be
great!
Go
home with this. God told Joseph what to
do. That bothered Joseph. It bothered him because he was happy where he
was. It bothered him because it was hard
to get his heart and his feet going in the same direction. It bothered him because he knew that his
life’s plan had just dramatically changed.
But he did what he was told to do.
And I do not think that he regretted it.
I think that he took one look in the holy toddler’s face and he knew
that he would do it again. My take it
home question for you is this, “Would you?”
Let us pray.